Speaker summary
36% 10 analyzed articles/videos 910.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Weijia Jiang results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 26.5% saturation with 510 hits . Analysis detected 1,762.323 faulty-reasoning hits from 910.667 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,992 of 28,364 speakers). This Weijia Jiang is better (less manipulative) than 98.70% of the peer group. Weijia Jiang
Speaker details
Total words: 910.667
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.3% percentile 3.9% BS Score10 analyzed videos910.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 10.4% 10.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 26.5% 26.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 0.9% 0.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 0.8% 0.8% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Speaker 5.5% 5.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 26.5%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Loss Aversion: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 2.5% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.4% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 0.3% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 0.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst