Author summary
29%1 analyzed article/video926 analyzed words
BS Summary: These JOCELYN NOVECK — AP National Writer results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Recency Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 256 hits. Analysis detected 1,170 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,778 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 31% (4,596 of 6,628 authors). This JOCELYN NOVECK — AP National Writer is better (less manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group.
JOCELYN NOVECK — AP National Writer
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
31%JOCELYN NOVECK — AP National Writer (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,778
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

31% percentile
025507510030.7% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.2%9.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.7%4.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.8%0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Burden of Proof: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Tu Quoque: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos