Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,122 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ramon Antonio Vargas results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Indoctrination , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 365 hits . Analysis detected 2,601 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,488 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 36% (4,103 of 6,346 authors). This Ramon Antonio Vargas is better (less manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group. Ramon Antonio Vargas
Author details
Total words: 4,488
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.4% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.0% 8.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst