Speaker summary
66% 17 analyzed articles/videos 264.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US military results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Begging the Question , with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 24.6% saturation with 137 hits . Analysis detected 990.988 faulty-reasoning hits from 264.333 analyzed words across 17 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 12.7% and a BS Rank of 18% (22,246 of 26,866 speakers). This US military is better (less manipulative) than 82.80% of the peer group. US military
Speaker details
Total words: 264.333
Content count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.2% percentile 12.7% BS Score17 analyzed videos264.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 26.1% 26.1% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 26.1% 26.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 24.6% 24.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 22.2% 22.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 11.1% 11.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 36.5% 36.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 16.3% 16.3% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 7.9% 7.9% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Speaker 5.7% 5.7% No True Scotsman Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 36.5%, sitewide 26.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 26.1%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 26.1%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 24.6%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 0.8% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 9.1% Recency Bias: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 2.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 0.6% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 0.4% No True Scotsman: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 0.1% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 0.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst