Speaker summary
47%7 analyzed articles/videos91.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tasnim results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 30.4% saturation with 52 hits. Analysis detected 185 faulty-reasoning hits from 91.667 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 27.6% and a BS Rank of 44% (14,574 of 25,928 speakers). This Tasnim is better (less manipulative) than 56.20% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

44% percentile
025507510043.8% percentile
27.6% BS Score7 analyzed videos91.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 74.4%74.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 30.4%30.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 18.1%18.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 12.3%12.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 12.3%12.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 18.1%18.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Framing Effect: Speaker 74.4%, sitewide 26.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 30.4%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 5.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate