Author summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,914 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AFP teams in Washington results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Overconfidence Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 1,674 hits . Analysis detected 13,387 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,864 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 40% (3,854 of 6,357 authors). This AFP teams in Washington is better (less manipulative) than 60.60% of the peer group. AFP teams in Washington
Author details
Total words: 14,864
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.4% percentile 2.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles14.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.3% 11.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.9%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst