Author summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 4,782 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tehran results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 2,686 hits . Analysis detected 19,310 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,532 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 32% (4,213 of 6,134 authors). This Tehran is better (less manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group. Tehran
Author details
Total words: 21,532
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.3% percentile 2.0% BS Score7 analyzed articles21.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.5% 12.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst