Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These AFP teams in Kuwait results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 512 hits. Analysis detected 2,908 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,196 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This AFP teams in Kuwait is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
AFP teams in Kuwait
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%AFP teams in Kuwait (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 3,196
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.0%9.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.8%4.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 6.3%6.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.0%1.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 16.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos