Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,550 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Islamabad results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 726 hits . Analysis detected 6,394 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,408 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 65% (2,238 of 6,315 authors). This Islamabad is worse (more manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group. Islamabad
Author details
Total words: 5,408
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.6% percentile 3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.6% 11.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.0% 10.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.4% 13.4% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 8.6% 8.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst