CNBC54%

Oil prices rise as U.S. and Iran fight for control of Strait of Hormuz 44%

By Spencer Kimball29%

7/12/2026, 10:07:32 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 100 hits. Analysis detected 796 faulty-reasoning hits from 432 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 47.1% and a BS Rank of 44% (12,319 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 56.30% of the article peer group.

Oil prices rose Sunday evening after the U.S. and Iran traded strikes as they contest control of the Strait of Hormuz, one of the most important trade routes for global energy supplies. 
U.S. crude oil futures were up 3.4% to $73.87 per barrel by 6:03 p.m. 
ET. 
Brent futures, the international benchmark, traded 3.5% higher at $78.67. 
The U.S. military launched another wave of strikes Sunday against Iran after hitting 140 targets on Saturday, according to U.S. 
Central Command . 
The strikes are in response to an attack by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps on a container ship transiting Hormuz. 
Iran responded Sunday with strikes on U.S. military facilities in Jordan, Kuwait, Bahrain and Oman, according to the state news agency Tasnim . 
Iranian state media said the Revolutionary Guard had closed the Hormuz until further notice, but the U.S. military disputed that claim. 
Centcom said the strait was open to "all vessels seeking to lawfully transit." 
"U.S. forces are positioned and prepared to ensure that freedom of navigation remains available despite unwarranted Iranian aggression, harassment, threats, and arbitrary declarations," Centcom said in a social media post Sunday. 
"Iran does not control the strait. 
Traffic is flowing." 
President Donald Trump said Hormuz was open in an interview with NBC News' "Meet the Press" that aired Sunday. 
The maritime intelligence firm Windward tracked nine ships that transited the strait on Saturday. 
The southern route through Oman's waters remains open to inbound and outbound traffic, said the Joint Maritime Information Center, a U.S.-led naval coalition in Bahrain that provides security updates to civilian ships transiting waters in the Middle East. 
But the security situation in Hormuz remains severe, the center said in a notice on Sunday. 
Mariners should exercise "extreme vigilance," it said. 
The weekend airstrikes are the fourth time the U.S. has bombed Iran over the past week in retaliation for attacks on commercial ships transiting Hormuz in the southern corridor protected by the U.S. military. 
Iran is demanding ships use a northern route through its territorial waters as it claims control of the strait. 
The latest outbreak of fighting stems from conflicting U.S. and Iranian interpretations of how Hormuz was supposed to reopen under an interim peace deal they signed on June 17. 
About 20% of the world's oil supplies transited Hormuz before the U.S. and Israel attacked Iran on Feb. 
28. 
Traffic plunged after Iran started attacking ships in the strait in early March, but transits had picked up after Washington and Tehran signed the interim deal. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 15.3%Spencer Kimball: 2.2%CNBC: 4.6%Confirmation Bias15.3%This article: 5.6%Spencer Kimball: 0.8%CNBC: 1.9%Anchoring Bias5.6%This article: 16.9%Spencer Kimball: 3.0%CNBC: 3.1%Availability Heuristic16.9%This article: 3.2%Spencer Kimball: 0.5%CNBC: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic3.2%This article: 0.0%Spencer Kimball: 0.0%CNBC: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 6.7%Spencer Kimball: 2.4%CNBC: 2.8%Overconfidence Bias6.7%This article: 11.8%Spencer Kimball: 10.1%CNBC: 6.5%Framing Effect11.8%This article: 0.0%Spencer Kimball: 0.0%CNBC: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 8.8%Spencer Kimball: 1.3%CNBC: 0.8%Status Quo Bias8.8%This article: 0.0%Spencer Kimball: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Kimball: 2.5%CNBC: 7.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Spencer Kimball: 1.2%CNBC: 2.1%Pessimism Bias2.3%This article: 23.1%Spencer Kimball: 7.2%CNBC: 6.4%Negativity Bias23.1%This article: 0.0%Spencer Kimball: 0.0%CNBC: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 4.4%Spencer Kimball: 0.6%CNBC: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error4.4%This article: 0.0%Spencer Kimball: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Kimball: 1.1%CNBC: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Kimball: 0.0%CNBC: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Kimball: 0.0%CNBC: 2.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Kimball: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Kimball: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.9%Spencer Kimball: 1.2%CNBC: 2.2%Recency Bias7.9%This article: 0.0%Spencer Kimball: 0.0%CNBC: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Kimball: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Kimball: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Kimball: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 17.4%Spencer Kimball: 3.8%CNBC: 5.0%Appeal to Authority17.4%This article: 7.9%Spencer Kimball: 2.2%CNBC: 1.0%False Dilemma7.9%This article: 0.0%Spencer Kimball: 0.0%CNBC: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Kimball: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.7%Spencer Kimball: 0.6%CNBC: 4.2%Hasty Generalization0.7%This article: 0.0%Spencer Kimball: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Kimball: 0.0%CNBC: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.2%Spencer Kimball: 6.7%CNBC: 2.5%Appeal to Emotion7.2%This article: 1.4%Spencer Kimball: 0.2%CNBC: 0.7%Begging the Question1.4%This article: 20.1%Spencer Kimball: 9.3%CNBC: 3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)20.1%This article: 0.0%Spencer Kimball: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Kimball: 0.0%CNBC: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Kimball: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Kimball: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.2%Spencer Kimball: 0.5%CNBC: 1.3%Anecdotal3.2%This article: 0.0%Spencer Kimball: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.8%Spencer Kimball: 1.3%CNBC: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.8%This article: 0.0%Spencer Kimball: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Kimball: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Kimball: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Kimball: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Kimball: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.4%Spencer Kimball: 1.8%CNBC: 2.5%Unattributed Quote4.4%This article: 7.2%Spencer Kimball: 2.9%CNBC: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection7.2%This article: 0.0%Spencer Kimball: 1.8%CNBC: 3.7%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Kimball: 0.2%CNBC: 0.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Kimball: 0.0%CNBC: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Kimball: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Kimball: 0.0%CNBC: 5.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

432 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers35%attributed speech282writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageCentral Command • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageCentral Command • 13 words • 100.0% coverageCentral Command • 31 words • 100.0% coverageCentral Command • 6 words • 100.0% coverageCentral Command • 3 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWindward • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJoint Maritime Information Center • 38 words • 0.0% coverageJoint Maritime Information Center • 16 words • 0.0% coverageJoint Maritime Information Center • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Central Command

95%flagged-word coverage
56 attributed words37% of attributed speech99% writer coverage
0%30.0%60.0%Quote-first Misdirection+55.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Central Command: 55.4%55.4%Unattributed Quote+33.9 ptsWriter: 0.0%Central Command: 33.9%33.9%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.