Speaker summary
46% 132 analyzed articles/videos 2,396.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Central Command results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Unattributed Quote , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 25.3% saturation with 814.517 hits . Analysis detected 4,748.231 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,396.333 analyzed words across 132 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 2% (25,192 of 25,516 speakers). This Central Command is better (less manipulative) than 98.70% of the peer group. Central Command
Speaker details
Total words: 2,396.333
Article count: 132
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.3% percentile 3.9% BS Score132 analyzed videos2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 5.6% 5.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 7.3% 7.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 0.6% 0.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 5.8% 5.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 4.2% 4.2% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 14.3% 14.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 25.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 1.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
WAMU 15% 7/21/2026, 7:52:27 AM