Speaker summary
69%11 analyzed articles/videos144 analyzed words
BS Summary: These TACO results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Appeal to Emotion, and Unattributed Quote, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 27.8% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 175 faulty-reasoning hits from 144 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 15.2% and a BS Rank of 23% (21,921 of 28,364 speakers). This TACO is better (less manipulative) than 77.30% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

23% percentile
025507510022.7% percentile
15.2% BS Score11 analyzed videos144 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 26.4%26.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 13.9%13.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 12.5%12.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 7.6%7.6%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 7.6%7.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 18.8%18.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 6.9%6.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 27.8%27.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 27.8%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 26.4%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 0.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate