Author summary
54%22 analyzed articles/videos19,298 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ivan Fernandez results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 6,777 hits. Analysis detected 76,062 faulty-reasoning hits from 81,026 analyzed words across 22 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 25% (4,641 of 6,135 authors). This Ivan Fernandez is better (less manipulative) than 75.60% of the peer group.
Ivan Fernandez
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
25%Ivan Fernandez (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 81,026
Article count: 22
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

24% percentile
025507510024.4% percentile
1.8% BS Score22 analyzed articles81K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.7%5.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.2%4.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.5%3.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 3.5%3.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 8.2%8.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 8.4%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.2%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate