L.A. TACO85%

What You Need To Know About ICE At The FIFA World Cup 30%

By Ivan Fernandez54%

6/13/2026, 5:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Appeal to Authority, and Recency Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 125 hits. Analysis detected 1,575 faulty-reasoning hits from 799 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39.9% and a BS Rank of 30% (14,442 of 20,360 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 70.90% of the article peer group.

There’s plenty of confusion and fear behind the World Cup here in Los Angeles thanks to a number of unknowns. 
Here at L.A. 
TACO, we’ve received numerous letters and messages about ICE enforcement during the tournament. 
Below is what we know and a few resources to help you stay calm and safe. 
Current DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin has said that ICE will be part of security operations in the U.S. during the World Cup. 
Naturally, many were concerned about what this meant, especially in light of ICE’s tactics since last summer, and despite the secretary’s explanation that ICE’s main responsibility would be in preventing the sale of counterfeit goods, and not in making immigration-related arrests. 
“So what do you find at a tremendous amount of sporting events? 
Counterfeit products, counterfeit tickets. 
You have counterfeit clothing being sold on the streets,” Mullin said, in an interview with CBS News. 
This is, in fact, routine for DHS to do. 
For example, in 2024, Alejandro Mayorkas, then-DHS Secretary during the Joe Biden administration, worked with the NFL, state enforcement agencies in Nevada, and local law enforcement agencies in Las Vegas to prepare for Super Bowl LVIII. 
The preparations included educating rideshare drivers on how to spot potential victims of human trafficking. 
ICE also has a webpage on its site explaining Homeland Security Investigation’s (HSI) role fighting “intellectual property theft and commercial fraud.” 
So should fans and residents be worried? 
ICE is still on the streets, and their tactics have shifted multiple times. 
Here’s what we know: 
As of this writing, we have not seen, heard, nor received any credible reports of ICE at SoFi Stadium or in Inglewood before, during, or after the opening game between the USA and Paraguay. 
Security was high, however, because Mullin attended the opening game with Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy. 
Any sightings of federal law enforcement personnel was connected to their appearance, along with planned law enforcement presence at the stadium on game days. 
That includes DHS security agents stationed in the stadium perimeter, at Metro stations, and other members of federal law enforcement, as L.A. 
TACO’s Izzy Ramirez explains in this video. 
Last year, L.A. 
TACO’s Memo Torres was able to confirm that Homeland Security, not ICE, were at the Rose Bowl during the Club World Cup. 
We also published this guide on how to tell ICE agents apart from other law enforcement officers at airports, which should also be helpful outside of airports. 
We want to remind readers that DHS operates multiple law enforcement groups within the department. 
It’s also important to note that the FIFA World Cup is officially a National Special Security Event (NSSE). 
This means that security for the tournament in the U.S. will be handled by DHS because the designation “centralizes security operations under federal direction for nationally significant events at increased risk of attack.” 
Meanwhile, The Daily Memo tracked a rise in arrests by ICE in L.A. this week, reporting: “On Tuesday, there were about a dozen incidents reported, while yesterday, Wednesday, we also saw about the same number. 
Around 15 people were taken by ICE on Tuesday and Wednesday in the Southland.” 
It’s possible that arrests will continue in this manner during the summer as more people are out and about. 
Keep in mind that Mullin has also publicly said that he’s pushing for “quieter” raids throughout the summer. 
CHIRLA and the Los Angeles Rapid Response Network (LAARN) have published a “Know Before You Go” rights guide for folks heading out into L.A. for a watch party, game, or any other World Cup-related event. 
The guide includes information on “safety while attending FIFA watch parties & soccer events in California.” 
The guide includes information on: 
Constitutional rights during encounters with immigration agents and law enforcement; 
Steps families can take to create an emergency preparedness plan; 
Practical suggestions for celebrating safely and responsibly in community settings; 
Guidance on documenting and reporting immigration enforcement activity; 
Contact information for Rapid Response Network hotlines that provide information, support, and assistance in the event of an immigration raid or enforcement action. 
"Every person in the United States has constitutional rights, regardless of immigration status, and communities deserve access to accurate information about those rights. 
By sharing this guide, we hope to help families stay informed, prepared, and able to participate in community celebrations with confidence and peace of mind,” states Erika Erika Schwerdt, Program Manager / Community Organizer- Antelope Valley Region, Strength Based Community Change (SBCC), a member of the LARRN and guide's leading author. 
The guide is currently available in English and Spanish, and will be translated into other languages as well. 
Readers can find additional information about their personal rights at CHIRLA’s website. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.5%Ivan Fernandez: 3.5%L.A. TACO: 3.9%Confirmation Bias9.5%This article: 0.0%Ivan Fernandez: 0.4%L.A. TACO: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 11.0%Ivan Fernandez: 4.2%L.A. TACO: 4.1%Availability Heuristic11.0%This article: 5.0%Ivan Fernandez: 1.1%L.A. TACO: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic5.0%This article: 3.0%Ivan Fernandez: 0.8%L.A. TACO: 0.5%Hindsight Bias3.0%This article: 1.1%Ivan Fernandez: 2.1%L.A. TACO: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias1.1%This article: 9.6%Ivan Fernandez: 5.1%L.A. TACO: 11.6%Framing Effect9.6%This article: 0.0%Ivan Fernandez: 0.5%L.A. TACO: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 1.1%Ivan Fernandez: 0.4%L.A. TACO: 0.6%Status Quo Bias1.1%This article: 0.0%Ivan Fernandez: 0.3%L.A. TACO: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 8.8%Ivan Fernandez: 4.6%L.A. TACO: 2.4%Optimism Bias8.8%This article: 6.5%Ivan Fernandez: 1.0%L.A. TACO: 0.9%Pessimism Bias6.5%This article: 8.5%Ivan Fernandez: 5.8%L.A. TACO: 11.3%Negativity Bias8.5%This article: 6.4%Ivan Fernandez: 2.1%L.A. TACO: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias6.4%This article: 0.0%Ivan Fernandez: 0.4%L.A. TACO: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Ivan Fernandez: 0.2%L.A. TACO: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ivan Fernandez: 3.4%L.A. TACO: 5.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ivan Fernandez: 0.8%L.A. TACO: 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Ivan Fernandez: 5.0%L.A. TACO: 6.0%Halo Effect2.9%This article: 0.0%Ivan Fernandez: 0.2%L.A. TACO: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ivan Fernandez: 0.0%L.A. TACO: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 13.4%Ivan Fernandez: 1.6%L.A. TACO: 1.0%Recency Bias13.4%This article: 0.0%Ivan Fernandez: 0.5%L.A. TACO: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ivan Fernandez: 0.1%L.A. TACO: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ivan Fernandez: 0.3%L.A. TACO: 1.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ivan Fernandez: 0.3%L.A. TACO: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 14.3%Ivan Fernandez: 3.6%L.A. TACO: 3.6%Appeal to Authority14.3%This article: 4.1%Ivan Fernandez: 0.8%L.A. TACO: 1.1%False Dilemma4.1%This article: 2.4%Ivan Fernandez: 0.0%L.A. TACO: 0.5%Slippery Slope2.4%This article: 0.0%Ivan Fernandez: 0.2%L.A. TACO: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.4%Ivan Fernandez: 5.7%L.A. TACO: 5.8%Hasty Generalization9.4%This article: 0.0%Ivan Fernandez: 0.3%L.A. TACO: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Ivan Fernandez: 1.1%L.A. TACO: 1.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 2.5%Ivan Fernandez: 5.7%L.A. TACO: 10.8%Appeal to Emotion2.5%This article: 0.0%Ivan Fernandez: 0.2%L.A. TACO: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 5.1%Ivan Fernandez: 2.3%L.A. TACO: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.1%This article: 0.0%Ivan Fernandez: 0.0%L.A. TACO: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 4.3%Ivan Fernandez: 0.3%L.A. TACO: 0.5%Burden of Proof4.3%This article: 0.0%Ivan Fernandez: 0.2%L.A. TACO: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 4.5%Ivan Fernandez: 0.2%L.A. TACO: 0.2%Composition/Division4.5%This article: 8.1%Ivan Fernandez: 4.3%L.A. TACO: 5.7%Anecdotal8.1%This article: 0.0%Ivan Fernandez: 0.2%L.A. TACO: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 15.4%Ivan Fernandez: 1.2%L.A. TACO: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)15.4%This article: 0.0%Ivan Fernandez: 0.0%L.A. TACO: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ivan Fernandez: 0.0%L.A. TACO: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ivan Fernandez: 0.1%L.A. TACO: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ivan Fernandez: 0.1%L.A. TACO: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ivan Fernandez: 0.1%L.A. TACO: 0.5%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.5%Ivan Fernandez: 1.0%L.A. TACO: 1.4%Unattributed Quote6.5%This article: 1.5%Ivan Fernandez: 0.4%L.A. TACO: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection1.5%This article: 10.4%Ivan Fernandez: 8.2%L.A. TACO: 8.7%Biased Writer Voice10.4%This article: 6.1%Ivan Fernandez: 2.4%L.A. TACO: 2.0%Indoctrination6.1%This article: 0.0%Ivan Fernandez: 2.2%L.A. TACO: 2.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ivan Fernandez: 0.0%L.A. TACO: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 15.6%Ivan Fernandez: 8.4%L.A. TACO: 2.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…15.6%

799 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers44%attributed speech444writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageMarkwayne Mullin • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 100.0% coverageMarkwayne Mullin • 12 words • 100.0% coverageMarkwayne Mullin • 4 words • 0.0% coverageMarkwayne Mullin • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageIzzy Ramirez • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageMemo Torres • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageThe Daily Memo • 35 words • 100.0% coverageThe Daily Memo • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageMarkwayne Mullin • 18 words • 0.0% coverageCHIRLA • 35 words • 100.0% coverageCHIRLA • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageCHIRLA • 10 words • 0.0% coverageCHIRLA • 10 words • 0.0% coverageCHIRLA • 10 words • 100.0% coverageCHIRLA • 8 words • 0.0% coverageCHIRLA • 23 words • 0.0% coverageErika Erika Schwerdt • 23 words • 100.0% coverageErika Erika Schwerdt • 51 words • 100.0% coverageCHIRLA • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

The Daily Memo

100%flagged-word coverage
49 attributed words14% of attributed speech84% writer coverage
0%37.5%75.0%Unattributed Quote+67.6 ptsWriter: 3.8%The Daily Memo: 71.4%71.4%Biased Writer Voice-18.7 ptsWriter: 18.7%The Daily Memo: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -8.8 ptsWriter: 8.8%The Daily Memo: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-3.6 ptsWriter: 3.6%The Daily Memo: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.