Topic summary
86% 24 analyzed articles/videos 23,356 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ice Operations results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 17,550 hits . Analysis detected 107,108 faulty-reasoning hits from 98,342 analyzed words across 24 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 25% (12,414 of 16,558 topics). This Ice Operations is better (less manipulative) than 75.00% of the peer group. Ice Operations
Topic details
Total words: 98,342
Article count: 24
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.0% percentile 2.1% BS Score24 analyzed articles98.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 12.7% 12.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 9.0% 9.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 11.8% 11.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst