Author summary
98% 1 analyzed article/video 1,990 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christian Datoc results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 21% saturation with 1,255 hits . Analysis detected 8,647 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,970 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 70% (1,897 of 6,315 authors). This Christian Datoc is worse (more manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group. Christian Datoc
Author details
Total words: 5,970
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.0% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 21.0% 21.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 17.9% 17.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.5% 14.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 9.4% 9.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.3% 6.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.5%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 21.0%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Author 14.9%, sitewide 19.2% Anecdotal: Author 17.9%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.3%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.4%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 6.0%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst