ICE Officers at Maine Shooting Scene Were Wearing Body Cameras. They Were Not Turned On. 36%

By Karl Loftus23%

7/16/2026, 6:05:34 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Unattributed Quote, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 144 hits. Analysis detected 1,197 faulty-reasoning hits from 838 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 42.9% and a BS Rank of 36% (14,129 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 64.60% of the article peer group.

Federal officers at the scene of a killing by U.S. 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement in Maine were wearing body cameras, according to four ICE officials who reviewed images from the scene  but the cameras are on multi-function devices that ICE officers use as radio mics. 
How ICE Arrests Went Quiet  and Got Even More Deadly 
After an ICE officer shot and killed a 25-year-old Colombian national this week in Biddeford, Maine , Secretary of Homeland Security Markwayne Mullin reportedly told Sen. 
Angus King, I-Maine, that officers involved in the shooting were not wearing body cameras. 
Yet the ICE officials who spoke with The Intercept, all of whom requested anonymity to protect their livelihoods, identified cameras among the equipment worn by two ICE officers nearby in the immediate aftermath of the shooting. 
The body-worn devices were not designed solely to capture evidential video, and are used primarily as remote microphones for ICE officers’ radio communications. 
(ICE did not respond to a request for comment.) 
“We are currently only using them as mics because of the AXON contract.” 
ICE officials who spoke to The Intercept identified the accessories worn by ICE officers on the scene of the Maine shooting as Motorola SVX Video Remote Speaker Microphones, a wireless radio mic with one other important feature: a camera. 
(Motorola did not respond to a request to comment.) 
Although the Motorola SVX worn by ICE officers are designed to work as body cameras, the ICE official said the function isn’t used. 
“They have multiple functionalities,” one ICE official who identified the Motorola SVX at the scene in Maine told The Intercept. 
“However, we are currently only using them as mics because of the AXON contract.” 
The Department of Homeland Security, ICE’s parent agency, purchases body-worn cameras through a contract with Axon, a law enforcement tech firm . 
(Axon did not respond to a request for comment.) 
Another ICE official showed The Intercept where, on their own Motorola SVX, a cover can be attached to the top of the device where the camera lens is, comparing it to the tech worn by officers at the Maine shooting scene. 
“This is where the cover clips over the camera lens,” the second ICE officer said. 
“Since the cameras don’t work they just leave the cover on.” 
The SVX mics worn by ICE are designed to record internally, capable of storing over 100 hours of standard-definition video, according to Motorola promotional materials and a technical support line. 
The video-recording function on the SVX mic, however, requires a subscription. 
Motorola is a giant in the world of government law enforcement and security work. 
Two Companies Fight to Corner the Police Body Camera Market 
According to a document published on the Department of Homeland Security’s website, ICE alone expects to spend more than $100 million on a six-year contract for Motorola’s line of APX Next All-Band Smart Radios and accessories, which would include the SVX mic. 
The deadly ICE shooting of Johan Sebastián Durán Guerrero in Maine stoked national outrage, coming on the heels of another fatal ICE shooting of Mexican immigrant Lorenzo Salgado Araujo in Houston. 
Neither man, according to news reports, had been the intended targets of the ICE arrest teams. 
And neither man’s death was captured by federal officers’ body-worn cameras, according to official reports. 
Shortly after the Maine shooting, ICE ordered its officers in the field to halt nearly all traffic stops . 
After reports of the order emerged and Trump complained , border czar Tom Homan pivoted to say the ICE vehicle stops would continue. 
Widely known today for its body cams, Axon used to be called Taser, named for the stun gun that built its reputation and which it still carries. 
The company does brisk business with ICE. 
Last month, presidential financial disclosures raised eyebrows over an ICE public request for a $220 million stun gun contract that appeared tailor-made for Axon’s Tasers. 
Only two weeks before the request for information went out, according to the disclosures, President Donald Trump purchased as much as $5 million in shares from Axon . 
During Trump’s winter immigration crackdown in Minnesota, ICE announced that it would be purchasing and distributing body cameras to every arrest team in the agency. 
After the deaths of Durán Guerrero and Salgado Araujo over past week, however, the Trump administration said the distribution was incomplete. 
“The body cameras have been ordered,” Homan, Trump’s border czar, said in a press conference. 
“There’s a deployment schedule on the books.” 
The Homeland Security Department said that half of ICE field offices already had body-worn cameras and the rest were expected to get them in the next two months. 
The new body cameras were funded through a $20 million congressional appropriation to expand ICE’s camera program, which includes contracts with Axon for the devices. 
The post ICE Officers at Maine Shooting Scene Were Wearing Body Cameras. 
They Were Not Turned On. appeared first on The Intercept . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.1%Karl Loftus: 4.0%The Intercept: 5.3%Confirmation Bias6.1%This article: 0.0%Karl Loftus: 0.6%The Intercept: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 9.4%Karl Loftus: 4.4%The Intercept: 3.0%Availability Heuristic9.4%This article: 0.0%Karl Loftus: 0.8%The Intercept: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Karl Loftus: 0.4%The Intercept: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Karl Loftus: 0.1%The Intercept: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.9%Karl Loftus: 7.3%The Intercept: 9.2%Framing Effect3.9%This article: 0.0%Karl Loftus: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Karl Loftus: 0.6%The Intercept: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Karl Loftus: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Karl Loftus: 0.7%The Intercept: 1.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Karl Loftus: 0.7%The Intercept: 2.2%Pessimism Bias3.8%This article: 13.2%Karl Loftus: 10.4%The Intercept: 12.3%Negativity Bias13.2%This article: 0.0%Karl Loftus: 0.4%The Intercept: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%Karl Loftus: 0.5%The Intercept: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error2.7%This article: 0.0%Karl Loftus: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Karl Loftus: 1.7%The Intercept: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Karl Loftus: 0.7%The Intercept: 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 1.7%Karl Loftus: 0.1%The Intercept: 1.0%Halo Effect1.7%This article: 0.0%Karl Loftus: 0.2%The Intercept: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Karl Loftus: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.2%Karl Loftus: 2.9%The Intercept: 1.3%Recency Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Karl Loftus: 0.3%The Intercept: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Karl Loftus: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Karl Loftus: 1.3%The Intercept: 2.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Karl Loftus: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 16.3%Karl Loftus: 5.5%The Intercept: 3.4%Appeal to Authority16.3%This article: 0.0%Karl Loftus: 0.4%The Intercept: 2.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Karl Loftus: 0.4%The Intercept: 1.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Karl Loftus: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 10.3%Karl Loftus: 5.1%The Intercept: 7.2%Hasty Generalization10.3%This article: 4.3%Karl Loftus: 0.5%The Intercept: 0.3%Red Herring4.3%This article: 0.0%Karl Loftus: 0.4%The Intercept: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.3%Karl Loftus: 4.6%The Intercept: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion6.3%This article: 0.0%Karl Loftus: 0.2%The Intercept: 1.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 17.2%Karl Loftus: 5.0%The Intercept: 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)17.2%This article: 0.0%Karl Loftus: 0.3%The Intercept: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Karl Loftus: 0.8%The Intercept: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Karl Loftus: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Karl Loftus: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.9%Karl Loftus: 2.0%The Intercept: 2.3%Anecdotal4.9%This article: 0.0%Karl Loftus: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.6%Karl Loftus: 1.9%The Intercept: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.6%This article: 0.0%Karl Loftus: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Karl Loftus: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Karl Loftus: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Karl Loftus: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 3.2%Karl Loftus: 0.3%The Intercept: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy3.2%This article: 15.8%Karl Loftus: 5.5%The Intercept: 2.1%Unattributed Quote15.8%This article: 0.6%Karl Loftus: 2.2%The Intercept: 1.3%Quote-first Misdirection0.6%This article: 16.2%Karl Loftus: 2.6%The Intercept: 10.5%Biased Writer Voice16.2%This article: 0.0%Karl Loftus: 0.3%The Intercept: 2.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Karl Loftus: 1.2%The Intercept: 6.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Karl Loftus: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Karl Loftus: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

838 words analyzed.

Speakers

8speakers32%attributed speech568writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageMarkwayne Mullin • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageICE • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageMotorola • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageDepartment of Homeland Security • 22 words • 0.0% coverageAxon • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageDepartment of Homeland Security • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageICE • 19 words • 0.0% coverageTom Homan • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageICE • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageTom Homan • 15 words • 0.0% coverageTom Homan • 7 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Homeland Security • 28 words • 0.0% coverageCongress • 25 words • 0.0% coverageThe Intercept • 12 words • 0.0% coverageThe Intercept • 11 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Tom Homan

51%flagged-word coverage
45 attributed words17% of attributed speech92% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Biased Writer Voice-23.9 ptsWriter: 23.9%Tom Homan: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-23.2 ptsWriter: 23.2%Tom Homan: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-0.9 ptsWriter: 0.9%Tom Homan: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.