Speaker summary
74% 35 analyzed articles/videos 2,722 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Homan results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 387.528 hits . Analysis detected 5,534.64 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,722 analyzed words across 35 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,693 of 28,165 speakers). This Tom Homan is better (less manipulative) than 98.30% of the peer group. Tom Homan
Speaker details
Total words: 2,722
Article count: 35
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.7% percentile 4.2% BS Score35 analyzed videos2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 7.8% 7.8% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 11.9% 11.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 13.7% 13.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 6.3% 6.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 10.2% 10.2% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 5.5% 5.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 3.9% 3.9% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst