Author summary
88%1 analyzed article/video1,041 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emma Platoff results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 510 hits. Analysis detected 3,032 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,123 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 72% (1,771 of 6,228 authors). This Emma Platoff is worse (more manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group.
Emma Platoff
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
72%Emma Platoff (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,123
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

72% percentile
025507510071.6% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.7%9.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 16.3%16.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 7.9%7.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 9.4%9.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 1.7%1.7%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 10.6%10.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 16.3%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 10.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 7.5%Recency Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.0%, sitewide 1.1%Circular Reasoning: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.1%Composition/Division: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos