Author summary
66% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,381 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Autumn Billings results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 1,847 hits . Analysis detected 13,215 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,134 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 57% (2,745 of 6,316 authors). This Autumn Billings is worse (more manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group. Autumn Billings
Author details
Total words: 12,134
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.5% percentile 2.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles12.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.7% 12.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.0% 8.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.2% 15.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.6% 3.6% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 5.5% 5.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.5%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst