Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Hayden Daniel results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 27.7% saturation with 1,154 hits . Analysis detected 9,844 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,170 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,616 authors). This Hayden Daniel is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Hayden Daniel
Author details
Total words: 4,170
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 27.7% 27.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 22.7% 22.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 16.8% 16.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 11.5% 11.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 18.2% 18.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 15.0% 15.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.8% 12.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 27.7%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect: Author 18.2%, sitewide 26.9% Indoctrination: Author 22.7%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias: Author 12.8%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.3%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 15.0%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Author 11.5%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Author 7.3%, sitewide 1.5% In-Group Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 3.1% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Begging the Question: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.9% Burden of Proof: Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.4% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst