Author summary
97% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,512 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Editorial Board results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.6% saturation with 1,569 hits . Analysis detected 10,807 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,372 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 75% (1,601 of 6,171 authors). This The Editorial Board is worse (more manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group. The Editorial Board
Author details
Total words: 6,372
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.1% percentile 3.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 24.6% 24.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.2% 8.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 18.1% 18.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 9.6% 9.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.7% 9.7% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 6.9% 6.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 24.6%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 18.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Author 9.6%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 6.9% Bandwagon: Author 6.9%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst