Author summary
76% 1 analyzed article/video 1,548 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Luke Hallam results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 1,057 hits . Analysis detected 8,014 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,192 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 68% (1,996 of 6,218 authors). This Luke Hallam is worse (more manipulative) than 67.90% of the peer group. Luke Hallam
Author details
Total words: 6,192
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.9% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 16.4% 16.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 17.1% 17.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 9.2% 9.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 17.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.3%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Ad Hominem: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst