Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 5,059 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sam Ribakoff results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 32.6% saturation with 7,542 hits . Analysis detected 28,860 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,168 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 46% (3,544 of 6,496 authors). This Sam Ribakoff is better (less manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group. Sam Ribakoff
Author details
Total words: 23,168
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.5% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles23.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 32.5% 32.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 9.2% 9.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 8.5% 8.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 32.5%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 20.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.5%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Author 8.5%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst