Speaker summary
72% 13 analyzed articles/videos 640 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steven Cheung results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 25.1% saturation with 160.406 hits . Analysis detected 1,688.07 faulty-reasoning hits from 640 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.6% and a BS Rank of 9% (25,922 of 28,364 speakers). This Steven Cheung is better (less manipulative) than 91.40% of the peer group. Steven Cheung
Speaker details
Total words: 640
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.6% percentile 8.6% BS Score13 analyzed videos640 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 25.1% 25.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 11.2% 11.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 15.8% 15.8% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 15.4% 15.4% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 12.4% 12.4% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 18.8% 18.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 9.0% 9.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 12.2% 12.2% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 26.9% Ad Hominem: Speaker 25.1%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 15.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 4.6% Tu Quoque: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.2% Halo Effect: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 4.0% Anecdotal: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Special Pleading: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 0.3% Red Herring: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst