Ankara NATO Summit Leaves Big Trump Questions for Europe ⁠16%

By Rishi Iyengar⁠26% John Haltiwanger⁠21%

7/9/2026, 9:24:23 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Anecdotal, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 330 hits. Analysis detected 2,157 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,171 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 31.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (17,873 of 21,175 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 84.40% of the article peer group.

A weekly digest of national security, defense, and cybersecurity news from Foreign Policy reporters John Haltiwanger and Rishi Iyengar. 
Delivered Thursday. 
Less Trump. 
More Europe. 
What’s next? 
By Rishi Iyengar , a staff writer at Foreign Policy , and John Haltiwanger , a staff writer at Foreign Policy . 
NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte attends a press conference during the NATO summit in Ankara, Turkey, on July 8. 
NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte attends a press conference during the NATO summit in Ankara, Turkey, on July 8. 
Burak Kara/Getty Images 
July 9, 2026, 5:24 PM 
Welcome back to Foreign Policy ’s Situation Report, where your co-authors have somehow made it through not only another hectic multilateral gathering but also the first day without a World Cup match in weeks. 
They both plan to stay up late in Turkey to watch France play Morocco, though. 
Alright, here’s what’s on tap for the day: NATO takes stock after Trump’s amicable departure , the U.S.-Iran cease-fire takes further hits, and Turkey has a potential fighter jet breakthrough. 
The Future of NATO 3.0 
The pageantry has ended, the world leaders have left, and Ankara traffic is back to normal. 
And, notably, U.S. 
President Donald Trump—despite some halftime hiccups —left the NATO summit in Turkey’s capital on a positive note. 
“[T]here was tremendous love in that room,” Trump said in his final press conference, where he largely avoided criticizing the alliance’s other members like he has in the past. 
“There was tremendous unity in that room,” he added, using a word that NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte and European leaders had tried to repeatedly emphasize over the two-day gathering. 
And while those leaders will undoubtedly be breathing a sigh of relief at that sentiment(ality), keeping Trump happy wasn’t necessarily their core focus this year. 
“The way it all ended with the communiqué and the press conference, you could almost say it was business as usual with the Trump show on the side,” Torrey Taussig, who served as a Europe director on former U.S. 
President Joe Biden’s National Security Council, told SitRep in Ankara. 
“Unlike last year in The Hague , where it really felt like everyone was holding their breaths to see what the president was going to say, my conversations with NATO officials but also allied officials were kind of shoulder shrugs.” 
We heard a similar refrain from officials and summit attendees both in public and private—that Europe and Canada are stepping up to do more to shoulder their burden within the alliance and secure their own defense without depending on Washington. 
They showed progress toward that goal in Ankara, but there are other looming questions that the alliance must face—chief among them when and how a less-American NATO will actually materialize. 
“Less on display at the summit but very much behind closed doors was: What does NATO 3.0 mean for the alliance going forward?” 
said Taussig, who is now a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council. 
“There wasn’t as much conversation about the [U.S. 
Defense Department’s] force posture review and how U.S. engagement and presence in Europe might look,” she added. 
A broken relationship. 
At last year’s summit, there was a “genuine hope” among NATO allies that “maybe if we flatter him [Trump] enough, it’s all going to be fine,” Nathalie Tocci, who is the director of the Rome-based Institute of International Affairs think tank and was in Ankara, told SitRep. 
But now, “no one has any illusions about Trump anymore,” Tocci said, and allies realize that the relationship between the U.S. president and NATO is “broken.” 
At the same time, they’re in “the business of not revealing the fact that it’s broken,” she added, because they can’t make that “explicit” in the midst of the Russia-Ukraine war. 
They expect Trump to lob insults, and they let it happen—because it could always be worse (such as Trump making good on his threat to withdraw the United States from NATO). 
NATO is now “playing a waiting game,” Tocci said: working to minimize the chances for further blowups with Trump while hoping that “something will happen internally in the United States” and that eventually there will be “an administration with whom one can work.” 
So despite Trump’s amicable parting words, NATO faces an uncertain future—and it remains unclear if there will even be a summit next year. 
On Wednesday, Rutte confirmed that the next gathering will be in Albania, but he said a date has not been set yet. 
Tocci suspects this is because there’s concern that Trump would not show. 
“You can’t have a summit without the U.S., unless that’s the summit to declare NATO dead,” Tocci said. 
What should be high on your radar, if it isn’t already. 
U.S.-Iran cease-fire crumbles. 
The weekslong truce between the United States and Iran that began with the signing of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) in mid-June appears to be on its last legs. 
The two countries exchanged fire for a second day in a row on Thursday. 
Iran’s push for control over tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz is at the heart of tensions, and the renewed fighting has rattled energy markets, as FP’s Keith Johnson writes . 
At the NATO summit on Wednesday, Trump said he thought the cease-fire was “over,” but he also offered conflicting messages on what could happen next. 
He suggested that the United States wasn’t necessarily returning to all-out war, but that strikes would continue. 
Sure enough, the United States announced fresh strikes on Iran mere hours after Trump departed Ankara. 
A report from Axios, based on comments from a U.S. official, suggested that the bombing campaign could continue for days or potentially even weeks. 
Turkey’s F-35 waiting game. 
One of the other big questions hanging over this year’s NATO summit was how Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan might leverage his country’s hosting of the summit and his close relationship with Trump. 
Trump said ahead of the summit that he would remove U.S. sanctions imposed on Turkey during his first term in 2020 over its purchase of the Russian-made S-400 missile defense system. 
He also opened the door to reversing a ban on Turkey buying F-35 fighter jets from the United States. 
Doing so would require congressional approval , as U.S. lawmakers passed that ban into law back when the sanctions were imposed. 
It would also face heavy opposition from another key U.S. ally, Israel. 
Trump was a little more noncommittal during his final summit press conference on Wednesday. 
“We have to make a decision [on] who we give it to,” he said, referring to the F-35. 
“Whether or not we do that, I haven’t totally made up my mind,” he added, but he called Erdogan “a great ally.” 
Crowds of mourners surround the convoy carrying the coffins of former Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and members of his family during a funeral procession ahead of his burial in Mashhad, Iran, on July 9. 
Crowds of mourners surround the convoy carrying the coffins of former Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and members of his family during a funeral procession ahead of his burial in Mashhad, Iran, on July 9. 
Atta Kenare/AFP via Getty Images 
Monday, July 13: The European “Coalition of the Willing” for Ukraine begins a two-day meeting in Paris. 
Wednesday, July 15: The 10-year anniversary of the attempted coup in Turkey takes place. 
The Senate confirmation hearing for Todd Blanche to become U.S. attorney general is scheduled to be held. 
Thursday, July 16: The British Labour Party’s leadership election is due to be completed. 
59— the percentage of U.S. 
Jews who hold an unfavorable opinion of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, according to a new poll of more than 1,000 Jewish adults by The Associated Press and Chicago University’s NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. 
“It’s difficult—there are a lot of Ukrainian drones in the air.” 
— Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, answering a question from Trump on whether he would visit Moscow. 
FP’s Most Read This Week 
The Strategy Behind the Battle for Crimea by Paul Hockenos 
War Has Become Pointless by Stephen M. 
Walt 
Israel Belongs in the New Saudi-Iranian Order by Trita Parsi 
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot 
You may recall from yesterday’s SitRep intro that Trump abruptly decided to fly back from Ankara on the old Air Force One plane instead of his shiny new Qatari-gifted jet. 
The move was reportedly made due to unspecified security concerns, but Trump said during his press conference that it was so the new plane could fly to a few U.S. military bases in Europe so troops stationed there could admire it. 
“We’ll be going home by normal methods,” he said. 
But the U.S. president appears to have pulled a reverse switcheroo: switching back to the Qatari aircraft at the United Kingdom’s RAF Mildenhall base (after aforementioned troop admiration ) for his flight back to Washington. 
“As the president has said recently, there are many enemies of America who have their sights on him, and we use every tool at our disposal — including distraction and misdirection — to address those threats,” White House Communications Director Steven Cheung told the New York Times . 
Rishi Iyengar is a staff writer at Foreign Policy . 
Bluesky: @iyengarish.bsky.social X: @Iyengarish Instagram: @iyengar.rishi 
John Haltiwanger is a staff writer at Foreign Policy . 
Bluesky: @jchaltiwanger.bsky.social X: @jchaltiwanger 
Marco Rubio Burned Down the House to Fix a Sink 
Ukraine Finally Has a Theory of Victory. 
Will It Work? 
Putin May Escalate, but Ukraine Is Winning 
U.S., Iran Return to the Brink of All-Out War 
The Global Energy Map Is Being Redrawn in Real Time 
Will Iraq's New Prime Minister Really Take On Corruption? 
Ukraine Finally Has a Theory of Victory in the War Against Russia 
Trump Wraps Up NATO Summit in Ankara With Iran Threats, Ukraine Promise 
Trump: U.S.-Iran Cease-Fire Is 'Over' After Strikes Resume in Strait of Hormuz 
Negotiators from the United States, Canada, and five European countries converse after finishing the draft of the North Atlantic Treaty in Washington on March 18, 1949. 
Trans-Atlanticism Isn’t Dead—It’s Being Renegotiated 
Alexandra de Hoop Scheffer 
An illustration of a vintage-style map featuring North America and parts of Europe and Africa. 
Overlaid on the map are 3D red brick walls shaped exactly like the borders of the contiguous United States and Alaska, casting long shadows to the right. 
America, the Once Global Nation 
A painting depicts Roosevelt on horseback, his right hand raising a sword in the air as he leads a cavalry charge of other U.S. soldiers on horseback. 
The horses' eyes are wide and bulging with fear, and there are scattered starbursts around the scene indicating artillery fire. 
How to Spin an Empire 
An illustration showing a pair of hands tightly wringing out an American flag. 
Water droplets shaped like missiles squeeze out of the twisted fabric and fall toward a puddle shaped like the map of Iran on a red background. 
U.S. 
Power Is Wrung Out 
A rocket is seen from a great distance, flying through a deep blue sky during military drills. 
Several parallel plumes of smoke are seen alongside the rocket's path. 
Missile Defense Worked Against Iran. 
It Might Not Work Against China. 
A creative illustration against a pale yellow background showing a garden planter containing a dense green hedge. 
Five human arms emerge from the hedge, with four of the hands holding small flags of China, Russia, the United States, and the European Union, while the fifth hand holds the flag of India. 
Hedging Is the New Normal 
Republican presidential nominee, former President Donald Trump pumps his fist as he walks off stage at the end of a campaign rally at the Santander Arena on November 04, 2024 in Reading, Pennsylvania. 
The End of America’s Soft Power 
Central Military Commission Vice Chairman Zhang Shengmin raises his right hand in a salute to Chinese President Xi Jinping, who is walking a level lower in a red-carpeted auditorium. 
The Deeper Pattern Behind China’s Military Purges 
An aerial photo shows Doha in the booming petrostate of Qatar. 
For What AI Could Do to Democracies, Look to the Petrostates 
Zelensky and Rutte walk beside one another. 
Rutte is smiling and gesturing in a welcoming manner toward Zelensky. 
Why This Year’s NATO Summit Is Different for Ukraine 
Ukraine’s ambassador to the United States breaks it down in a new interview. 
Billboards with the slogans “Key to Peace,” “Key to Security,” and “Shared Future in Peace”, displayed along the boulevard on the protocol route ahead of the NATO Summit in Ankara, on 26 June. 
Can NATO Pull Off a Dull Summit? 
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, France's President Emmanuel Macron, and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer at the start of the E-3 meeting during the 62nd Munich Security Conference on February 13, 2026 in Munich, Germany. 
Europe Is Struggling to Lead NATO 
A pharmacy sign displays the temperature of 44 degrees Celsius in Brussels. 
NATO’s New Enemy Is the Thermometer 
As the Tide Turns Against Putin, Beware the Drowning Man 
Ukraine’s New Momentum? 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 1.0%Rishi Iyengar: 2.4%Foreign Policy: 3.4%Confirmation Bias1.0%This article: 0.5%Rishi Iyengar: 0.2%Foreign Policy: 0.4%Anchoring Bias0.5%This article: 6.1%Rishi Iyengar: 1.9%Foreign Policy: 2.6%Availability Heuristic6.1%This article: 2.9%Rishi Iyengar: 0.4%Foreign Policy: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic2.9%This article: 0.0%Rishi Iyengar: 0.4%Foreign Policy: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.6%Rishi Iyengar: 1.6%Foreign Policy: 2.3%Overconfidence Bias0.6%This article: 2.7%Rishi Iyengar: 4.3%Foreign Policy: 4.9%Framing Effect2.7%This article: 0.0%Rishi Iyengar: 0.1%Foreign Policy: 0.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.2%Rishi Iyengar: 0.2%Foreign Policy: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.2%This article: 0.0%Rishi Iyengar: 0.1%Foreign Policy: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.9%Rishi Iyengar: 3.2%Foreign Policy: 1.8%Optimism Bias3.9%This article: 3.2%Rishi Iyengar: 2.5%Foreign Policy: 2.9%Pessimism Bias3.2%This article: 15.2%Rishi Iyengar: 9.9%Foreign Policy: 7.9%Negativity Bias15.2%This article: 0.0%Rishi Iyengar: 0.5%Foreign Policy: 0.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Rishi Iyengar: 0.5%Foreign Policy: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error1.4%This article: 1.5%Rishi Iyengar: 0.2%Foreign Policy: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias1.5%This article: 2.2%Rishi Iyengar: 0.5%Foreign Policy: 0.7%In-Group Bias2.2%This article: 0.0%Rishi Iyengar: 0.4%Foreign Policy: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Rishi Iyengar: 1.4%Foreign Policy: 1.6%Halo Effect3.6%This article: 0.0%Rishi Iyengar: 0.1%Foreign Policy: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rishi Iyengar: 0.0%Foreign Policy: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.9%Rishi Iyengar: 2.1%Foreign Policy: 1.4%Recency Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%Rishi Iyengar: 0.3%Foreign Policy: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rishi Iyengar: 0.0%Foreign Policy: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rishi Iyengar: 1.1%Foreign Policy: 0.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Rishi Iyengar: 0.0%Foreign Policy: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.4%Rishi Iyengar: 2.1%Foreign Policy: 2.9%Appeal to Authority2.4%This article: 1.2%Rishi Iyengar: 1.2%Foreign Policy: 1.7%False Dilemma1.2%This article: 1.9%Rishi Iyengar: 0.6%Foreign Policy: 1.3%Slippery Slope1.9%This article: 1.0%Rishi Iyengar: 0.2%Foreign Policy: 0.2%Circular Reasoning1.0%This article: 5.1%Rishi Iyengar: 3.9%Foreign Policy: 4.8%Hasty Generalization5.1%This article: 0.0%Rishi Iyengar: 0.1%Foreign Policy: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.2%Rishi Iyengar: 0.1%Foreign Policy: 0.2%Bandwagon0.2%This article: 5.2%Rishi Iyengar: 1.8%Foreign Policy: 2.7%Appeal to Emotion5.2%This article: 0.1%Rishi Iyengar: 0.5%Foreign Policy: 0.8%Begging the Question0.1%This article: 2.9%Rishi Iyengar: 2.8%Foreign Policy: 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.9%This article: 0.0%Rishi Iyengar: 0.0%Foreign Policy: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.0%Rishi Iyengar: 0.2%Foreign Policy: 0.3%Burden of Proof2.0%This article: 1.3%Rishi Iyengar: 0.3%Foreign Policy: 0.2%Appeal to Nature1.3%This article: 0.0%Rishi Iyengar: 0.1%Foreign Policy: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 7.0%Rishi Iyengar: 0.8%Foreign Policy: 1.2%Anecdotal7.0%This article: 0.0%Rishi Iyengar: 0.1%Foreign Policy: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.7%Rishi Iyengar: 0.8%Foreign Policy: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.7%This article: 0.0%Rishi Iyengar: 0.0%Foreign Policy: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Rishi Iyengar: 0.2%Foreign Policy: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Rishi Iyengar: 0.0%Foreign Policy: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Rishi Iyengar: 0.0%Foreign Policy: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.2%Rishi Iyengar: 0.1%Foreign Policy: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.2%This article: 2.4%Rishi Iyengar: 1.3%Foreign Policy: 1.8%Unattributed Quote2.4%This article: 2.2%Rishi Iyengar: 1.7%Foreign Policy: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection2.2%This article: 8.7%Rishi Iyengar: 7.8%Foreign Policy: 5.5%Biased Writer Voice8.7%This article: 1.0%Rishi Iyengar: 0.6%Foreign Policy: 1.1%Indoctrination1.0%This article: 0.0%Rishi Iyengar: 0.9%Foreign Policy: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rishi Iyengar: 0.2%Foreign Policy: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%Rishi Iyengar: 0.6%Foreign Policy: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.9%

2171 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers28%attributed speech1,563writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 29 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageTorrey Taussig • 39 words • 100.0% coverageTorrey Taussig • 10 words • 0.0% coverageTorrey Taussig • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageTorrey Taussig • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageTorrey Taussig • 8 words • 0.0% coverageTorrey Taussig • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageNathalie Tocci • 47 words • 0.0% coverageNathalie Tocci • 26 words • 0.0% coverageNathalie Tocci • 31 words • 0.0% coverageNathalie Tocci • 31 words • 0.0% coverageNathalie Tocci • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageMark Rutte • 22 words • 0.0% coverageNathalie Tocci • 12 words • 0.0% coverageNathalie Tocci • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 31 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 18 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageVolodymyr Zelensky • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageSteven Cheung • 48 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Nathalie Tocci

100%flagged-word coverage
208 attributed words34% of attributed speech58% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Biased Writer Voice-9.6 ptsWriter: 9.6%Nathalie Tocci: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -2.7 ptsWriter: 2.7%Nathalie Tocci: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-1.4 ptsWriter: 1.4%Nathalie Tocci: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.