Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video790 analyzed words
BS Summary: These ASHRAF KHALIL Associated Press results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 464 hits. Analysis detected 3,203 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,160 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 74% (1,663 of 6,359 authors). This ASHRAF KHALIL Associated Press is worse (more manipulative) than 73.90% of the peer group.
ASHRAF KHALIL Associated Press
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
74%ASHRAF KHALIL Associated Press (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,160
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

74% percentile
025507510073.9% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.9%7.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 14.7%14.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.1%7.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 13.6%13.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 7.6%7.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.1%4.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.1%1.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 13.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.7%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 11.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos