Speaker summary
48% 49 analyzed articles/videos 3,002.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Samuel Alito results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 360 hits . Analysis detected 4,257.156 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,002.333 analyzed words across 49 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 1% (25,578 of 25,762 speakers). This Samuel Alito is better (less manipulative) than 99.30% of the peer group. Samuel Alito
Speaker details
Total words: 3,002.333
Article count: 49
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.7% percentile 3.1% BS Score49 analyzed videos3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 8.9% 8.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 5.9% 5.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 1.0% 1.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 6.0% 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 5.0% 5.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 0.7% 0.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Slippery Slope: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst