Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,574 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alexis Romero results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Negativity Bias , and Indoctrination , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.9% saturation with 3,904 hits . Analysis detected 16,255 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,236 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,103 of 6,316 authors). This Alexis Romero is worse (more manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group. Alexis Romero
Author details
Total words: 12,236
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.7% percentile 3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles12.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 31.9% 31.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 15.9% 15.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 12.9% 12.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.6% 9.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.3% 14.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 31.9%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.6%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 15.9%, sitewide 2.0% Indoctrination: Author 12.9%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.9% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst