Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video4,440 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rodger D. Citron results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 1,927 hits. Analysis detected 11,302 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,760 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 14% (5,387 of 6,263 authors). This Rodger D. Citron is better (less manipulative) than 86.00% of the peer group.
Rodger D. Citron
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
14%Rodger D. Citron (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 17,760
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

14% percentile
025507510014.0% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles17.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.8%10.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.7%6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 10.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos