Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 4,440 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rodger D. Citron results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 1,927 hits . Analysis detected 11,302 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,760 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 14% (5,387 of 6,263 authors). This Rodger D. Citron is better (less manipulative) than 86.00% of the peer group. Rodger D. Citron
Author details
Total words: 17,760
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.0% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles17.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.2%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst