Author summary
37%1 analyzed article/video1,061 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ariana Figueroa results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 614 hits. Analysis detected 2,697 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,244 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 46% (3,395 of 6,196 authors). This Ariana Figueroa is better (less manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group.
Ariana Figueroa
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
46%Ariana Figueroa (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,244
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

45% percentile
025507510045.2% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.5%6.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.6%3.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos