Speaker summary
42% 26 analyzed articles/videos 537.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York Post results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Confirmation Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 258 hits . Analysis detected 2,429.775 faulty-reasoning hits from 537.333 analyzed words across 26 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 7.3% and a BS Rank of 7% (26,609 of 28,364 speakers). This New York Post is better (less manipulative) than 93.80% of the peer group. New York Post
Speaker details
Total words: 537.333
Content count: 26
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.2% percentile 7.3% BS Score26 analyzed videos537.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 21.7% 21.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 14.4% 14.4% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 12.0% 12.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 19.4% 19.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 16.4% 16.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 20.0% 20.0% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 8.9% 8.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 12.3% 12.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 26.9% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 21.7%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 7.5% Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 5.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.5% Special Pleading: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst