Author summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,799 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Georgia Worrell results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.8% saturation with 2,532 hits. Analysis detected 13,081 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,434 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (1,912 of 6,137 authors). This Georgia Worrell is worse (more manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group.
Georgia Worrell
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠69%Georgia Worrell (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,434
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

69% percentile
025507510068.9% percentile
3.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.3%5.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 21.2%21.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.5%6.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 13.8%13.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 26.8%26.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 26.8%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Author 21.2%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.8%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 12.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.7%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Horn Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.0%Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos