Speaker summary
47% 25 analyzed articles/videos 2,404.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neil Gorsuch results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 410.027 hits . Analysis detected 3,001.064 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,404.667 analyzed words across 25 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 1% (28,121 of 28,364 speakers). This Neil Gorsuch is better (less manipulative) than 99.10% of the peer group. Neil Gorsuch
Speaker details
Total words: 2,404.667
Article count: 25
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.9% percentile 3.3% BS Score25 analyzed videos2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 8.6% 8.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 9.7% 9.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.7% 3.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 16.0% 16.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 0.8% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Primacy Effect: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.2% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst