Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,848 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alison Gash results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 857 hits . Analysis detected 7,049 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,392 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 46% (3,472 of 6,358 authors). This Alison Gash is better (less manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group. Alison Gash
Author details
Total words: 7,392
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.4% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.6% 11.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 6.3% 6.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 2.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Slippery Slope: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst