Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,951 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael M. Rosen results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Halo Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 3,141 hits . Analysis detected 14,293 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,448 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 22% (5,135 of 6,551 authors). This Michael M. Rosen is better (less manipulative) than 78.40% of the peer group. Michael M. Rosen
Author details
Total words: 18,448
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.6% percentile 1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles18.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 17.0% 17.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.0% 9.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 17.0%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.0%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst