Author summary
47% 2 analyzed articles/videos 4,389 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Suderman results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Confirmation Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 2,002 hits . Analysis detected 15,789 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,128 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 44% (3,605 of 6,347 authors). This Peter Suderman is better (less manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group. Peter Suderman
Author details
Total words: 14,128
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.2% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles14.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.2% 14.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.0% 13.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.2%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.0%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst