Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 7,273 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Garrett Epps results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 2,986 hits . Analysis detected 24,425 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,011 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 22% (5,229 of 6,628 authors). This Garrett Epps is better (less manipulative) than 78.90% of the peer group. Garrett Epps
Author details
Total words: 28,011
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles28K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.7% 10.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.7%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst