Author summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 461 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neil Gorsuch results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Quote-first Misdirection , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.7% saturation with 364 hits . Analysis detected 1,649 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,844 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of â 82% (1,236 of 6,628 authors). This Neil Gorsuch is worse (more manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group. Neil Gorsuch
Author details
Total words: 1,844
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.4% percentile 4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.3% 7.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.3% 5.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 18.1% 18.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 19.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 18.1%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 7.3%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.3%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 6.2%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 5.3%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst