Speaker summary
43% 36 analyzed articles/videos 1,131.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Park Service results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Negativity Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 28.8% saturation with 618 hits . Analysis detected 2,054.083 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,131.333 analyzed words across 36 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 3% (26,371 of 26,944 speakers). This National Park Service is better (less manipulative) than 97.90% of the peer group. National Park Service
Speaker details
Total words: 1,131.333
Content count: 36
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.1% percentile 4.7% BS Score36 analyzed videos1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 28.8% 28.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 6.6% 6.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 12.3% 12.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 5.7% 5.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 8.2% 8.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.8% 2.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 6.9% 6.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 28.8%, sitewide 11.1% Framing Effect: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 0.8% In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst