Author summary
4% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,595 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jordan Liles results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Anecdotal , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 527 hits . Analysis detected 4,541 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,681 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 10% (5,704 of 6,299 authors). This Jordan Liles is better (less manipulative) than 90.60% of the peer group. Jordan Liles
Author details
Total words: 8,681
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.4% percentile 1.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.1% 6.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst