Speaker summary
29% 11 analyzed articles/videos 233 analyzed words
BS Summary: These MTA results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Burden of Proof , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 24.2% saturation with 145 hits . Analysis detected 379 faulty-reasoning hits from 233 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.9% and a BS Rank of 8% (26,321 of 28,364 speakers). This MTA is better (less manipulative) than 92.80% of the peer group. MTA
Speaker details
Total words: 233
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.2% percentile 7.9% BS Score11 analyzed videos233 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 24.3% 24.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 13.4% 13.4% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 6.3% 6.3% Sunk Cost Effect Sitewide 0.3% Speaker 4.0% 4.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 0.8% 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Speaker 2.8% 2.8% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 8.2% 8.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 24.3%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 7.5% Burden of Proof: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 0.4% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.3% Recency Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst