Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,067 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Benton Graham results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.5% saturation with 520 hits . Analysis detected 6,190 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,448 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 8% (5,867 of 6,348 authors). This Benton Graham is better (less manipulative) than 92.40% of the peer group. Benton Graham
Author details
Total words: 11,448
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.6% percentile 1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst