Gothamist76%

One of the Bronx's oldest subway stations gets a $123M makeover after years of delays 40%

By Ramsey Khalifeh0%

7/6/2026, 10:30:47 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Recency Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 552 faulty-reasoning hits from 487 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 45% and a BS Rank of 40% (12,840 of 21,198 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 60.60% of the article peer group.

The MTA is wrapping up a $123 million upgrade to one of the Bronx's oldest subway stations. 
The project  which faced nearly three years of delays  added elevators and restored the 120-year-old headhouse at the 149th Street-Grand Concourse station. 
When it opened in 1905, the station was called Mott Avenue after a street that no longer exists. 
The original station had elevators, but they were removed in the 1970s and it’s remained inaccessible to wheelchair users ever since. 
The station grew dilapidated over the decades. 
Nearby residents are receiving the MTA’s project to restore the mosaic tiling and brick on the station’s headhouse as a long-overdue investment in the South Bronx’s aging transit infrastructure. 
“When I look at it, the Bronx should’ve been fixed up a long time ago,” 72-year-old Johnny Chisholm said. 
“Downtown, they keep it cleaner because that's where all the tourists come. 
The tourists don’t come into the Bronx.” 
The MTA agrees the project is overdue. 
The work began in 2021, and the agency plans to open the new elevators later this summer. 
But a consultant report published by the agency in June said construction was 32 months behind schedule, and blamed the delays on their “contractor’s inability to effectively manage, plan, resource, coordinate, and recover the work.” 
The Mott Avenue station, now called 149th Street-Grand Concourse, had elevators until the 1970s. 
"Bronx riders have every reason to be excited about the improvements coming to 149th Street-Grand Concourse,” MTA spokesperson Michael Cortez wrote in a statement. 
“While the project has been delayed by contractor performance issues, the MTA is working around the clock to bring it to completion and deliver a fully accessible station while restoring one of the subway system's historic station houses." 
Last week, contractors were cleaning up the restored headhouse and adding the finishing touches to its facade. 
Chisholm said the station crumbled for decades while the surrounding neighborhood evolved. 
He pointed to a strip of restaurants on the Grand Concourse that replaced a gas station, and to a bridge crossing the Harlem River where the old Bronx Market used to be before it was replaced by a larger shopping complex in 2009. 
Locals said the project would be welcome news for elderly and disabled people in the South Bronx who have long struggled to climb the station’s stairs. 
The new elevators, which were built inside the old headhouse, are among dozens of accessibility projects the MTA has completed in recent years. 
The transit agency settled a lawsuit in 2022 by agreeing to make 95% of the city’s subway stations accessible to people with disabilities by 2055. 
Zamora Davila, another longtime Bronx resident, said she was happy to see the old headhouse be repurposed. 
“It's about time. 
It's been like that for so long. 
I never thought it would be in use,” she said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 1.4%Ramsey Khalifeh: 2.5%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias1.4%This article: 0.0%Ramsey Khalifeh: 1.3%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 12.7%Ramsey Khalifeh: 2.4%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic12.7%This article: 1.4%Ramsey Khalifeh: 0.5%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic1.4%This article: 3.9%Ramsey Khalifeh: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Ramsey Khalifeh: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 14.0%Ramsey Khalifeh: 7.5%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect14.0%This article: 0.0%Ramsey Khalifeh: 1.5%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.3%Ramsey Khalifeh: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias4.3%This article: 1.4%Ramsey Khalifeh: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect1.4%This article: 14.8%Ramsey Khalifeh: 4.3%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias14.8%This article: 2.1%Ramsey Khalifeh: 1.7%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias2.1%This article: 3.9%Ramsey Khalifeh: 7.8%Gothamist: 8.5%Negativity Bias3.9%This article: 3.5%Ramsey Khalifeh: 2.3%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias3.5%This article: 7.2%Ramsey Khalifeh: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error7.2%This article: 0.0%Ramsey Khalifeh: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.3%Ramsey Khalifeh: 0.8%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias5.3%This article: 0.0%Ramsey Khalifeh: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Ramsey Khalifeh: 0.5%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect4.9%This article: 0.0%Ramsey Khalifeh: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ramsey Khalifeh: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.2%Ramsey Khalifeh: 0.9%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias8.2%This article: 0.0%Ramsey Khalifeh: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ramsey Khalifeh: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ramsey Khalifeh: 0.7%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ramsey Khalifeh: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Ramsey Khalifeh: 3.7%Gothamist: 4.4%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Ramsey Khalifeh: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Ramsey Khalifeh: 0.7%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ramsey Khalifeh: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Ramsey Khalifeh: 2.4%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Ramsey Khalifeh: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Ramsey Khalifeh: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Ramsey Khalifeh: 4.1%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ramsey Khalifeh: 0.8%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 5.1%Ramsey Khalifeh: 1.5%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.1%This article: 0.0%Ramsey Khalifeh: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 7.8%Ramsey Khalifeh: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof7.8%This article: 0.0%Ramsey Khalifeh: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ramsey Khalifeh: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.8%Ramsey Khalifeh: 1.6%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal6.8%This article: 0.0%Ramsey Khalifeh: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.5%Ramsey Khalifeh: 0.3%Gothamist: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.5%This article: 0.0%Ramsey Khalifeh: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ramsey Khalifeh: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ramsey Khalifeh: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ramsey Khalifeh: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ramsey Khalifeh: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.1%Ramsey Khalifeh: 0.7%Gothamist: 1.2%Unattributed Quote2.1%This article: 0.0%Ramsey Khalifeh: 1.5%Gothamist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Ramsey Khalifeh: 1.9%Gothamist: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Ramsey Khalifeh: 2.1%Gothamist: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Ramsey Khalifeh: 0.1%Gothamist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ramsey Khalifeh: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ramsey Khalifeh: 0.3%Gothamist: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

487 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers41%attributed speech288writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageJohnny Chisholm • 19 words • 0.0% coverageJohnny Chisholm • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJohnny Chisholm • 7 words • 0.0% coverageMTA • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageMichael Cortez • 24 words • 0.0% coverageMTA • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageJohnny Chisholm • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJohnny Chisholm • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageZamora Davila • 17 words • 0.0% coverageZamora Davila • 3 words • 0.0% coverageZamora Davila • 7 words • 0.0% coverageZamora Davila • 10 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Michael Cortez

100%flagged-word coverage
24 attributed words12% of attributed speech81% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.