Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video70 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Cortez results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Indoctrination, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 55.4% saturation with 40.997 hits. Analysis detected 176.671 faulty-reasoning hits from 70 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 39.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (12,022 of 28,364 speakers). This Michael Cortez is worse (more manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group.
Michael Cortez
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠58%Michael Cortez (selected)40%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 70
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510057.6% percentile
39.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos70 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 55.4%55.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 52.7%52.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 38.7%38.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 27.9%27.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 27.9%27.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Optimism Bias: Speaker 55.4%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 52.7%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 38.7%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 27.9%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 27.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos