Topic summary
57% 93 analyzed articles/videos 60,846 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Urban Development results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 20,962 hits . Analysis detected 219,013 faulty-reasoning hits from 294,712 analyzed words across 93 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 5% (15,024 of 15,769 topics). This Urban Development is better (less manipulative) than 95.30% of the peer group. Urban Development
Topic details
Total words: 294,712
Article count: 93
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.7% percentile 1.4% BS Score93 analyzed articles294.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst