Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Tiffany Koyama Lane results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.3% saturation with 613 hits . Analysis detected 3,950 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,754 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Tiffany Koyama Lane is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Tiffany Koyama Lane
Author details
Total words: 2,754
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 22.3% 22.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.8% 12.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.7% 10.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.9% 15.9% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.8%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 22.3%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 15.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.0%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Author 7.5%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 3.7% Anecdotal: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst