Gothamist77%

MTA rolls out new subway cars on D line, giving Bronx daily access to modern trains 22%

By Jessica Gould0%

7/1/2026, 8:32:10 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Recency Bias, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 23.4% saturation with 87 hits. Analysis detected 650 faulty-reasoning hits from 372 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 35.4% and a BS Rank of 22% (17,236 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 78.80% of the article peer group.

MTA officials on Wednesday announced modern subway cars will start rolling on the D line, replacing breakdown-prone trains that date back to the 1980s. 
The new cars  called R211s  have more standing room, wider doors and more modern digital displays than their 20th-century predecessors. 
They're also equipped with security cameras and electronic signal technology that can eventually help speed up service. 
The MTA rolled out the R211s on the B line last year. 
That expansion allowed the modern cars to service the Bronx for the first time  but only on weekdays, because the B doesn’t run on weekends. 
By adding them to the D line, New Yorkers can ride the new cars from Norwood to Coney Island and back every day of the week. 
“Riders tell us in surveys that they love the designs and the extra space of these 211s,” said MTA Chair Janno Lieber. 
“We love the fact that they’re so much less prone to breakdowns, almost 300,000 miles that they are running between breakdowns, which is double the rest of our fleet.” 
Lieber cast the arrival of the new cars as the latest in a spate of triumphs for the city, including the Knicks' recent championship win. 
“Has there ever been a better time to be a New Yorker?” 
he quipped. 
The cars are replacing the R68s, which Lieber noted debuted on the subways in 1986 “when the Mets had that amazing comeback in the World Series where we rocked the Red Sox’s world.” 
Since 2018, the MTA has ordered 1,988 modern train cars  including the R211s  for the subway’s lettered lines from the manufacturer Kawasaki at a cost of $6.75 billion. 
The company faced repeated delays in delivering the new train sets. 
In addition to the D line, the R211s are running on the A, B, C and G lines, the Rockaway Shuttle, and the Staten Island Railway. 
The MTA also plans to deploy modern cars on the N, R and W lines. 
The MTA earlier this year announced it would buy at least 1,140 new subway cars to replace old trains on the system’s numbered lines. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.9%Jessica Gould: 3.8%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias5.9%This article: 0.0%Jessica Gould: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%Jessica Gould: 5.0%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic5.9%This article: 0.0%Jessica Gould: 0.9%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Gould: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Gould: 1.4%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 12.9%Jessica Gould: 7.9%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect12.9%This article: 0.0%Jessica Gould: 2.2%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 7.0%Jessica Gould: 3.4%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias7.0%This article: 6.5%Jessica Gould: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect6.5%This article: 8.6%Jessica Gould: 4.3%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias8.6%This article: 0.0%Jessica Gould: 1.9%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Jessica Gould: 7.9%Gothamist: 8.5%Negativity Bias3.0%This article: 7.8%Jessica Gould: 3.6%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias7.8%This article: 0.0%Jessica Gould: 1.5%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Gould: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Gould: 1.8%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Gould: 0.7%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 20.4%Jessica Gould: 1.9%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect20.4%This article: 0.0%Jessica Gould: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Gould: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 15.6%Jessica Gould: 2.2%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias15.6%This article: 8.9%Jessica Gould: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect8.9%This article: 0.0%Jessica Gould: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Gould: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Gould: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.9%Jessica Gould: 4.8%Gothamist: 4.4%Appeal to Authority5.9%This article: 0.0%Jessica Gould: 1.5%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Gould: 1.7%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Gould: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Gould: 6.4%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Gould: 1.2%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 6.7%Jessica Gould: 2.3%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon6.7%This article: 23.4%Jessica Gould: 8.5%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion23.4%This article: 0.0%Jessica Gould: 0.9%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Gould: 3.3%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Gould: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Gould: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Gould: 1.2%Gothamist: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Gould: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 14.8%Jessica Gould: 7.8%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal14.8%This article: 0.0%Jessica Gould: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.8%Jessica Gould: 1.3%Gothamist: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.8%This article: 0.0%Jessica Gould: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Gould: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Gould: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Gould: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Gould: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Gould: 0.4%Gothamist: 1.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 7.8%Jessica Gould: 0.5%Gothamist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection7.8%This article: 0.0%Jessica Gould: 2.3%Gothamist: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Gould: 0.8%Gothamist: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Gould: 0.7%Gothamist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Gould: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%Jessica Gould: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…5.9%

372 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers61%attributed speech144writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageMTA • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageMTA • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageJanno Lieber • 22 words • 0.0% coverageJanno Lieber • 29 words • 100.0% coverageJanno Lieber • 25 words • 0.0% coverageJanno Lieber • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJanno Lieber • 2 words • 0.0% coverageJanno Lieber • 33 words • 0.0% coverageMTA • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageMTA • 15 words • 0.0% coverageMTA • 24 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Janno Lieber

98%flagged-word coverage
123 attributed words54% of attributed speech71% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Quote-first Misdirection+23.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Janno Lieber: 23.6%23.6%Attempt to Sell a Product -15.3 ptsWriter: 15.3%Janno Lieber: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.