Speaker summary
41% 17 analyzed articles/videos 1,237.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lionel Scaloni results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Self-Serving Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 160.923 hits . Analysis detected 1,641.841 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,237.667 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 1% (28,175 of 28,364 speakers). This Lionel Scaloni is better (less manipulative) than 99.30% of the peer group. Lionel Scaloni
Speaker details
Total words: 1,237.667
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.7% percentile 3.0% BS Score17 analyzed videos1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 7.2% 7.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 3.1% 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 6.3% 6.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.1% 2.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 8.6% 8.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 9.9% 9.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst