Author summary
22% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,786 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan Tannenwald results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 1,071 hits . Analysis detected 6,203 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,918 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 39% (3,889 of 6,359 authors). This Jonathan Tannenwald is better (less manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group. Jonathan Tannenwald
Author details
Total words: 7,918
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.8% percentile 2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 13.5% 13.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst